TSTP Solution File: SEV428^1 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : SEV428^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:06:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.96s 2.17s
% Output : Proof 1.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEV428^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 01:56:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.96/2.17 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.96/2.17 % Mode: mode506
% 1.96/2.17 % Inferences: 2037
% 1.96/2.17 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.96/2.17 thf(ty_a, type, a : $i).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(ty_eps, type, eps : (($i>$o)>$i)).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(ty_epsio, type, epsio : ((($i>$o)>$o)>$i>$o)).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : ($i>$o)).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(ty_c, type, c : (($i>$o)>$o)).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(h0, assumption, (![X1:($i>$o)>$o]:(![X2:$i>$o]:((X1 @ X2) => (X1 @ (eps__0 @ X1))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(eigendef_eigen__0, definition, eigen__0 = (eps__0 @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ a)))))))), introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__0])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> (![X1:$i>$o]:((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ a))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> (eigen__0 @ a),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> ((c @ (epsio @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1)))))))))) => (~(((epsio @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1))))))))) @ (eps @ (epsio @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1)))))))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> ((c @ eigen__0) => (~(sP2))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> (![X1:$i]:(~((eigen__0 @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> (c @ eigen__0),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> (![X1:$i>$o]:((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (eigen__0 @ (eps @ eigen__0)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> ((epsio @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1))))))))) @ (eps @ (epsio @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1))))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> (c @ (epsio @ (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X1) => (~((X1 @ (eps @ X1)))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> (sP10 => (![X1:$i]:(~(((epsio @ (^[X2:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X2) => (~((X2 @ (eps @ X2))))))))) @ X1))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP12,plain,sP12 <=> (sP6 => (~(sP8))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(sP13,plain,sP13 <=> (![X1:$i]:(~(((epsio @ (^[X2:$i>$o]:(~(((c @ X2) => (~((X2 @ (eps @ X2))))))))) @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(def_setunion,definition,(setunion = (^[X1:($i>$o)>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((![X3:$i>$o]:((X1 @ X3) => (~((X3 @ X2))))))))))).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(def_choosenonempty,definition,(choosenonempty = (^[X1:($i>$o)>$o]:(epsio @ (^[X2:$i>$o]:(~(((X1 @ X2) => (~((X2 @ (eps @ X2)))))))))))).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(conj,conjecture,(~(sP11))).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(h1,negated_conjecture,sP11,inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(1,plain,(~(sP5) | ~(sP2)),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(choiceax,axiom,(![X1:$i>$o]:((~((![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2)))))) => (X1 @ (eps @ X1))))).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(2,plain,(sP8 | sP5),inference(choice_rule,[status(thm)],[choiceax])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(3,plain,(~(sP13) | ~(sP9)),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(4,plain,(sP3 | sP9),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(5,plain,(sP3 | sP10),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(6,plain,(~(sP7) | sP12),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(7,plain,((~(sP12) | ~(sP6)) | ~(sP8)),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(choiceaxio,axiom,(![X1:($i>$o)>$o]:((~((![X2:$i>$o]:(~((X1 @ X2)))))) => (X1 @ (epsio @ X1))))).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(8,plain,(~(sP3) | sP7),inference(choice_rule,[status(thm)],[choiceaxio])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(9,plain,(sP4 | sP2),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(10,plain,(sP4 | sP6),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(11,plain,(sP1 | ~(sP4)),inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[h0,eigendef_eigen__0])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(12,plain,((~(sP11) | ~(sP10)) | sP13),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(ca,axiom,((setunion @ c) @ a)).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(13,plain,(~(sP1)),inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[ca]).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(14,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,h1])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(15,plain,$false,inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h1]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h0])],[14,h0])).
% 1.96/2.17 thf(0,theorem,(~(sP11)),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h1])],[14,h1])).
% 1.96/2.17 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------